Of all the times that the Holy Spirit is mentioned or appears in the Gospels one occasion struck me as odd. It’s not what happened that was strange, but what didn’t happen. What I want to write about is the account of Christ’s baptism. It wasn’t the reaction of the people at the moment of His baptism that was peculiar, but their reaction to Him afterwards that I want to explore.
When Christ was baptized in the Jordan by John the Baptist the scriptures say in Matthew that “after Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and lighting on Him, and behold, a voice out of the heavens said, ‘this is My beloved Son, in whom I am well-pleased’ ” Mark says that “He saw the heavens opening, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon Him…”. My question is this: Why didn’t Israel recognize at this moment that Christ was God’s anointed, their messiah? It would make sense, historically speaking, that the Holy Spirit’s falling on Christ would garner some sort of reaction. They should have remembered the accounts of Saul and David, when the Holy Spirit entered into them, granting them the authority to lead Israel. Or at least they would remember Moses, who had the Spirit, in order that He could lead the people out of Egypt.
On top of several extraordinarily important historical events, which would have been burned into their minds since they were children, they had the prophets. Who told of a day when the Lord would put in them His Spirit, which would cause them to walk in His statutes, and they would be careful to observe His ordinances. All of Israel clung to the hope of a day when He would heal and save them. They knew that there was a man coming, the Lords anointed, that would save and lead them to righteousness. Not to mention the prophesy of John the Baptist in Isaiah, which is obviously fulfilled before Christ comes to Him to be baptized.
As I read the baptism accounts in Matthew and Mark I noticed that they were recorded from an omniscient view. For example, Matthew said after Christ came out of the water he saw the heavens open up and the spirit descend on him. So it was Christ that saw the spirit, not Matthew or any of the disciples (they were still fishing or being shady tax collectors), so it was reasonable to believe that nobody else saw it. Which may get them off the hook, right? If they couldn’t see it then there is no way that any connections could have been made at that moment. After reading Luke’s account I realized that couldn’t have been the case. Luke will say that “the Holy Spirit descended on Him in bodily form, like a dove…” there isn’t a mention of Christ seeing it, as in Matthew and Mark. Which leads me believe that Luke wants us to understand that all could see it, not just Christ.
It is further confirmation of our stupidity that such a clear affirmation of the Messiah could be completely missed. Throughout the Old Testament God consistently uses the Holy Spirit to empower his servants to carry out His will, and it was no different with Christ. So one would assume that at the moment the Holy Spirit fell on Christ there would have been a national recognition of Christ as the promised one of God, His Son. Now, if all would have repented at the moment the Holy Spirit fell on Christ and turned to Him, He wouldn’t have been killed, which would have left us without a Savior. So I see it as God’s sovereign ordinance that those that were present at His baptism missed the connection, than many might be saved through His death and resurrection.
This was a short paper for my systematic class. I enjoyed writing it so I decided to share. Later on.
